<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Chrome Frame do more harm than good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dan-menard.com/2009/10/07/does-chrome-frame-do-more-harm-than-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dan-menard.com/2009/10/07/does-chrome-frame-do-more-harm-than-good/</link>
	<description>The Web according to Dan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thinh Dinh (TD)</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-menard.com/2009/10/07/does-chrome-frame-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinh Dinh (TD)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-menard.com/?p=3#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hey, 

Thanks for the link. I know someone who can make uses of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, </p>
<p>Thanks for the link. I know someone who can make uses of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-menard.com/2009/10/07/does-chrome-frame-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-menard.com/?p=3#comment-8</guid>
		<description>My current preference for IE6 is to massively water it down; support the essential content, but not much else, and of course encourage the user to upgrade their browser if it&#039;s at all reasonable to do so. This link sums it up:
http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My current preference for IE6 is to massively water it down; support the essential content, but not much else, and of course encourage the user to upgrade their browser if it&#8217;s at all reasonable to do so. This link sums it up:<br />
<a href="http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css" rel="nofollow">http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinh Dinh (TD)</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-menard.com/2009/10/07/does-chrome-frame-do-more-harm-than-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinh Dinh (TD)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-menard.com/?p=3#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read about this issue in the article &quot;Google Has A Solution For Internet Explorer: Turn It Into Chrome&quot; (http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/22/google-turns-internet-explorer-into-chrome-yes-seriously/) on TechCrunch. The user comment section pretty much sum up the sentiment among the users (which I assume are mostly techie/developer). 

Though the solution is not the greatest, I think it&#039;s possibly (one of) the best of the worst. Maybe the act of introducing Google Frame in itself is part of a strategy to educate the users on the greatness (or cr@pness) of IE6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read about this issue in the article &#8220;Google Has A Solution For Internet Explorer: Turn It Into Chrome&#8221; (<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/22/google-turns-internet-explorer-into-chrome-yes-seriously/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/22/google-turns-internet-explorer-into-chrome-yes-seriously/</a>) on TechCrunch. The user comment section pretty much sum up the sentiment among the users (which I assume are mostly techie/developer). </p>
<p>Though the solution is not the greatest, I think it&#8217;s possibly (one of) the best of the worst. Maybe the act of introducing Google Frame in itself is part of a strategy to educate the users on the greatness (or cr@pness) of IE6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
